Development of low- and high-demanding tasks for the Greek primary school CLIL programme

Panagiota Grammatikopoulou

Abstract


The study aims to investigate how a framework that develops tasks on a continuum from less to more demanding ones applies in the Greek primary school CLIL programme for the subject of Geography in English. A class of 19 6th-grade learners participated in the study. The framework was based on Cummins’ CLIL Matrix (1984); tasks of different cognitive and linguistic demands were performed by the target learners. Their performance was measured; classroom observations were carried out; questionnaires were delivered to the learners to examine their reactions and difficulties concerning the specific tasks. The results showed that the proposed framework can be successful within the particular CLIL context. Further research is required, however, to draw safer conclusions.

Keywords


CLIL, tasks, cognitive demands, linguistic demands, Greek primary CLIL context

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, C. 2001. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Bygate, M. 2010. Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coyle, D., P. Hood & D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crookes, G. & C. Chaudron. 2001. Guidelines for language classroom instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. USA: Heinle & Heinle, 13-28.

Cummins, J. 1984. Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Cummins, J. 1992. Language proficiency, bilingualism, and academic achievement. In P. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow (eds), The multilingual classroom: Readings for content-area teachers. White Plains, New York, NY: Longman, 16-26.

Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182-204.

Dalton-Puffer, C. & U. Smit (eds). 2007. Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse. Franktfurt; Vienna: Peter Lang.

Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grabe, W. & F.L. Stoller. 1997. Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M.A. Snow & D.M. Brinton (eds), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. New York, NY: Longman, 5-21.

Jäppinen, A.K. 2005. Thinking and content learning of Mathematics and Science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education 19(2): 147-168.

Navés, T. 2009. Effective Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) programmes. In Y.R. de Zarobe & R.M. Jimenez Catalan (eds), Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol; Buffalo; Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 22-40.

Nunan, D. 2004. Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. 2006. Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. 2012. Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 45(2): 143-179.

Ur, P. 1981. Discussions that work: Task-centred fluency practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Panagiota Grammatikopoulou

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, unless otherwise stated.