On explaining “Explanations”

Gaberell Drachman

Abstract


What is an explanation? The popular responses are: We can explain what a word means, how to run a computer programme, why John decided to marry Jane, and even historical facts like the extinction of the dinosaurs. But what about explananda such as the linguistic entity “Who saw John?”. The paper surveys a spectrum of responses, some theory-free, others theory-bound. For all of these, we employ the six Dimensions of explanation.

Keywords


linguistic theory, syntax, Minimalist Program

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.

Boeckx, C. 2006. Linguistic minimalism: Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borer, H. 2005. Structuring sense. Volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Broekhuis, H. & E. Woolford. 2013. Minimalism and optimality theory. In M. den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 122-161.

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. 2012. Problems of projection. Talk at Leiden University.

Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33-49.

Chomsky, N. & H. Lasnik. 1993. The Theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld & T. Vennemann (eds), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, Vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter, 506-569.

Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Dijk, T.A. 1972. Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague: Mouton.

Drachman, G. 1981. On explaining “All the explicanda of the previous theory”. Popper and the growth of Linguistics. In E. Morscher, O. Neumaier & G. Zecha (eds), Essays in Scientific Philosophy. Dedicated to Paul Weingartner. Bad Reichenhall: Comes Verlag, 281-298.

Duhem, P. 1914/1954. The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Epstein, S.D., H. Kitahara & T.D. Seely. 2011. Derivation(s). In C. Boeckx (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291-310.

Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB.

Greenberg, J.H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J.H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 73-113.

Harris, Z. 1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hempel, C. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York/ London: The Free Press.

von Humboldt, W. 1836. Ueber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaus und ihren Einfluss auf die geistliche Entwicklung des Menschen-geschlechts. [On the diversity of human language and its influence on the mental development of the human species. Cambridge University Press. 1999].

Joos, M. (ed.). 1957. Readings in linguistics. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.

Koyre, A. 1957. From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91-196.

Lamb, S.M. 1966. Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

Langacker, R.W. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Laudan, L. 1977. Progress and its problems. Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lavoisier, A. 1777. Mémoire sur la combustion en général. Mémoires de I'Académie royale des sciences. Paris.

Lenneberg, E. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Lewin, K. 1935. The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. In D.K. Adams & K.E. Zener (transl.), A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers by Kurt Lewin. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1-42.

Marantz, A. 2001. Words. Handout for invited lecture, 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, University of Southern California. Retrieved from

http://babel.ucsc.edu/~hank/mrg.readings/ Marantz_words.pdf

Marantz, A. 2005. “Objects out of the lexicon: Objects as events”. Ms., Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/marantz/Public/Vienna/Vienna.pdf

Montague, R. 1970. Universal grammar. Theoria 36: 373-398.

Newmeyer, F. 1986. Has there been a ‘Chomskyan Revolution’ in linguistics? Language 62: 1-18.

Newton, I. 1687. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Jussu Societatis Regiæ ac Typis Josephi Streater.

van Orman Quine, W. 1960. Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Popper, K. 1935. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer [Translated as: The logic of scientific discovery, London: Hutchinson, 1959].

Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Priestley, J. 1774-1777. Experiments and observations on different kinds of air. London: W. Bowyer and J. Nichols/ London: Printed for J. Johnson.

Samek-Lodovici, V. 2006. Optimality theory and the minimalist program. In H. Broekhuis & R. Vogel (eds), Optimality theory and minimalism: A possible convergence? Linguistics in Potsdam 25: 77-97.

Sapir, E. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

de Saussure, F. 1916/1960. Course in General Linguistics. Eds. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. London: Owen.

Seuren, P. 1998. Western linguistics: An historical introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Smolensky, P. 2000. Grammar-based connectionist approaches to language. Cognitive Science 23: 589-613.

Trubetzkoy, N. 1969/1936. Principles of phonology. Translated by C.A.M. Baltaxe. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Woehler, F. 1828. Ueber die kuenstliche Bildung von Harnstoff [On the artificial synthesis of urea]. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 88.2: 253-256.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Gaberell Drachman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, unless otherwise stated.